Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakuta Azusagawa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Rascal Does Not Dream of Bunny Girl Senpai#Main characters. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Sakuta Azusagawa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sakuta Azusagawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and has only one source. Character is not notable. lullabying (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Delete Independent notability for any character needs to be established to justify a separate article. For future reference, @Franki3971:, see Naruto Uzumaki and how that article is laid out, specifically how most of that article (or any featured article about a character) mostly contains real-world information about the character's creation, and their reception.--十八 22:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Redirect to Rascal Does Not Dream of Bunny Girl Senpai#Main characters (quite a mouthful), as this article fails GNG. The one source does not even discuss the character outside of a passing mention done in an in-universe style. The article also fails WP:PLOT since it is written from an entirely in-universe point of view. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Comment: @Devonian Wombat: To be honest, this character isn't even particularly notable so I don't think it warrants a redirect. lullabying (talk) 20:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Perhaps not, but the character does have a pretty extensive bio at the main page, so unless that is removed a redirect is probably the best choice. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Delete, notability is not inherited. GNG fail. dibbydib ^boop or _snoop 02:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.